PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 12, 2024Journal of Institute of Science and Technology2 citationsOpen Access

In-situ Assessment of Natural Radioactivity Concentrations and Hazard Indicators in the Mining Area of Lalitpur, Nepal

View Full Paper
DUDevendra Raj UpadhyayPAP. AdhikariBKBal Vikram Khatri

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Urban construction materials predominantly originate from mining sites, raising concerns about the associated natural radioactivity and its potential health impacts. This work focuses on assessing the distribution of three natural radionuclides and associated radiological indicators in the South Lalitpur mining area in Nepal. A portable gamma spectrometer information system (PGIS-2) was employed for in-situ measurement of natural radionuclide concentrations. The mean activity concentrations of 238U, 232Th, and 40K were found to be 85.82 ± 40.63 Bq kg−1, 104.87 ± 30.42 Bq kg−1, and 1257.47 ± 304.36 Bq kg−1, respectively. Radiological hazard parameters were computed and compared with global averages, revealing a radium equivalent activity (Raeq) mean of 332.62 ± 63.08 Bq kg−1, slightly below the global average. The average absorbed gamma radiation dose rate in the air was 155.94 ± 29.09 nSv hr-1, over twice the world average. Indoor and outdoor annual effective dose rates, excess lifetime cancer risks, and annual gonadal dose equivalents were slightly higher than world averages. Additional radiological indices were computed, indicating that most estimated parameters exceeded global averages. Multivariate statistical analysis was applied to the dataset. The study suggests that in-situ measurements of these radiological parameters in mining areas are essential, as most mean values were above global averages, emphasizing the need for environmental safety and awareness in mining regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Upadhyay et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60795b6db64358759b452https://doi.org/10.3126/jist.v29i1.60793
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Estimation of natural radioactivity and assessment of radiation hazard indices in soil samples of Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka, India2022 · 21 citations
  2. 2Distribution of gamma radiation dose rate related with natural radionuclides in all of Vietnam and radiological risk assessment of the built-up environment2020 · 53 citations
  3. 3Radioactive decays at limits of nuclear stability2012 · 427 citations
  4. 4Natural radioactivity in soil samples of Yelagiri Hills, Tamil Nadu, India and the associated radiation hazards2012 · 81 citations
  5. 5Outdoor effective dose and associated health risk in the premises of Tribhuvan University in-situ gamma ray spectrometry2019 · 7 citations