Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This essay is a plea to art educators in what is a global climate in a permacrisis both politically and physically. This is a deliberate and persuasive provocation to reorientate art education to avoid a reiteration that is taking place when the 20th and 21st centuries are compared in relation to the striking changes that are taking place in relation to a qualitative shift in technologies and the phase change of the earth. I develop this provocation by first developing the relations between art, science and philosophy of the 20th century, and art educations roll in this. I then turn to the 21st century to develop art, science and philosophy as they relate to the problematic developed by Peter Weibel and Bruno Latour in four significant exhibitions held at the KMZ. From there, I turn to anchor my theoretical support as to why Deleuze and Guattari particular expression of non‐philosophy is of key import to make this plea stick in relation to both digital mediation and the post‐Anthropocene.
jan jagodzinski (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: