Factors associated with surgical intervention in Native American patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

e16279 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the prevailing type of primary liver cancer, exhibited at a higher frequency in individuals afflicted by chronic liver conditions. Past literature has demonstrated the impact certain socioeconomic factors have on the prognosis of HCC. Native American patients often face late-stage cancer diagnoses and have the lowest survival rates among racial and ethnic groups. While surgery offers potential for cure, factors related to surgical interventions in liver cancer for Native American patients remain largely unexplored. Through the NCDB, this study analyzed factors associated with surgical intervention and survival trends in Native American patients with HCC. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify Native American patients diagnosed with Hepatocellular Carcinoma from 2004 to 2019 using the histology code 8170 and race code 03 as assigned by the Commission on Cancer Accreditation program. Kaplan-Meier, ANOVA Chi-Square, and Cox Proportional Hazards tests were performed. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 27, and statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Results: Of 1193 Native American patients included in this sample, 172 (14.4%) patients received surgical treatment for HCC, while 1021 (85.6%) patients did not receive surgical treatment for HCC. Native American patients who received surgery for HCC experienced a greater mean overall survival (90 months) when compared to the mean overall survival (24 months) in HCC Native American patients who did not receive surgical treatments (p < 0.001). When controlling for age, year of diagnosis, stage, grade, facility type and income status, receiving surgery showed an independent decrease in hazard (HR = 0.245; p < 0.05). HCC Native American patients who received surgery were more likely to be treated an at academic facility, have stage I disease, and have less aggressive tumors (grade) (p < 0.05). Native American patients who did not receive surgery were more likely to be older (62 vs 60 years old), have larger tumors, and have brain, bone, lung, and liver metastases (p < 0.05). No associations of surgical versus non-surgical treatment were seen in Charlson-Deyo score, urban or rural residence, and primary payor at diagnosis. Conclusions: Native American patients with HCC who received surgical intervention experienced improved overall survival compared to non-surgical treatment groups. Native American patients undergoing surgical intervention more often received care at academic or private institutions and had lower stages of HCC. These results follow previous trends, where cancer patients receiving adequate surgical intervention generally survive longer. Further research is needed to examine other treatment differences among Native American patients and how these findings compare across other disadvantaged groups.