Impact of the integration of remote clinical oncology pharmacists into routine precision medicine workflows on biomarker testing rates within The US Oncology Network community-based practices.

e13813 Background: The US Oncology Network implemented a centralized, remote clinical oncology pharmacist review program (ClinReview) into select community-based practices. Initially, pharmacists were integrated into a precision medicine workflow process to increase biomarker testing rates among patients receiving adjuvant treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, with recommendations achieving a 100% acceptance rate. Following this success, metastatic prostate cancer patients were incorporated into the established workflow, following updated guideline recommendations for both germline and somatic testing and the 2023 approvals of PARP inhibitors in the first-line treatment setting. With previously reported testing rates only reaching 60%, we sought to evaluate the impact of the pharmacist integration into the precision medicine workflow on biomarker testing in metastatic prostate patients. Methods: Over a 4-month period, ClinReview remotely identified patients with metastatic prostate cancer during normal order review. The EMR was reviewed to assess germline and somatic testing status. If testing was not ordered, the pharmacist sent a recommendation to the treating provider. Initial testing rates for germline and somatic testing, BRCA+ status and provider acceptance rates for testing recommendations were collected. Additional data was collected utilizing a de-identified database. While additional data collection is ongoing, descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze data and the impact of the pharmacists’ interventions. Results: Across 9 practices, 142 patients were initiated on treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. At the time of initial assessment, germline and somatic testing was not ordered in 50% and 37% of patients, respectively. Pharmacists recommended additional testing in 61 patients (43%) with a 73% provider acceptance rate. Findings showed equitable testing rates across racial demographics. Pharmacist workflow integration enhanced combined germline and somatic testing rates, demonstrating an improvement from a baseline of 57% up to 77% currently. Conclusions: Community oncology practices seek to provide high-value care, including offering the most current evidence-based precision medicine testing. These findings highlight the continued need for improved somatic and germline testing in metastatic prostate cancer. However, the implemented precision medicine pharmacist workflow demonstrates the positive impact a clinical pharmacist can have on both testing rates and the potential to improve therapeutic offerings within this growing treatment space. Table: see text