PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 20243 citationsOpen Access

Counterfactual Explanations for Visual Recommender Systems

View Full Paper
NJNeham JainVSVibhhu SharmaGSGaurav Sinha

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Users rely on clever recommendations for items they might like to buy, and service providers rely on clever recommender systems to ensure that their product is recommended to their target audience. Providing explanations for recommendations helps to increase transparency and the users' overall trust in the system, besides helping practitioners debug their recommendation model. Modern recommendation systems utilize multi-modal data such as reviews and images to provide recommendation. In this work, we propose CAVIAR (Counterfactual explanations for VIsual Recommender systems), a novel method to explain recommender systems that utilize visual features of items. Our explanation is counterfactual and is optimized to be simultaneously simple and effective. Given an item in the user's top-K recommended list, CAVIAR makes a minimal, yet meaningful, perturbation to the item's image-embedding such that it is no longer a part of the list. In this way, CAVIAR aims to find the visual features of the item that were the most relevant for the recommendation. In order to lend meaning to the perturbations, we leverage CLIP model to connect the perturbed image features to textual features. We frame the explanation as a natural language counterfactual by contrasting the observed visual features in the item before and after the perturbation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jain et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6a879b6db64358762ae71https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651484
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper