PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2024European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery16 citations

Open, endovascular, or hybrid repair of aortic arch disease: narrative review of diverse strategies with diverse options

View Full Paper
HTHiroo TakayamaYHYu HohriDBDerek R. Brinster

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES The management of aortic arch disease is complex. Open surgical management continues to evolve, and the introduction of endovascular repair is revolutionizing aortic arch surgery. Although these innovative techniques have generated the opportunity for better outcomes in select patients, they have also introduced confusion and uncertainty regarding best practices. METHODS In New York, we developed a collaborative group, the New York Aortic Consortium, as a means of cross-linking knowledge and working together to better understand and treat aortic disease. In our meeting in May 2023, regional aortic experts and invited international experts discussed the contemporary management of aortic arch disease, differences in interpretation of the available literature and the integration of endovascular technology into disease management. We summarized the current state of aortic arch surgery in this review article. RESULTS Approaches to aortic arch repair have evolved substantially, whether it be methods to reduce cerebral ischaemia, improve haemostasis, simplify future operations or expand options for high-risk patients with endovascular approaches. However, the transverse aortic arch remains challenging to repair. Among our collaborative group of cardiac/aortic surgeons, we discovered a wide disparity in our practice patterns and our management strategies of patients with aortic arch disease. CONCLUSIONS It is important to build unique institutional expertise in the context of complex and evolving management of aortic arch disease with open surgery, endovascular repair and hybrid approaches, tailored to the risk profiles and anatomical specifics of individual patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Takayama et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6ada0b6db64358762f992https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae179
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 12022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines2022 · 1,993 citations
  2. 2Multiple factors predict the risk of spinal cord injury after the frozen elephant trunk technique for extended thoracic aortic disease2014 · 114 citations
  3. 3Elephant trunk simplifies thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair without impacting operative risk2022 · 5 citations
  4. 4Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms2020 · 376 citations
  5. 5Hybrid repair of type A acute aortic dissections with the Lupiae technique: Ten-year results2014 · 27 citations