Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: To evaluate drug utilization and assess rational drug use in the treatment of patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension in Bulgaria, using quantitative and qualitative measures at national level. Design and method: Retrospective, observational, longitudinal study of data from the public registers of the National Health Insurance Fund for the period 2017-2021 using the WHO ATS/DDD methodology and descriptive statistical methods. Results: The analyzed population included 129 312 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension /I10/ - 11.09% of all hypertensive patients in Bulgaria. The average cost per year was 8 229 567.10 BGN (1 Euro=1.95583 BGN) - respectively the cost per patient per year was 63.64 BGN, the monthly cost was 5.30 BGN and the cost per day was 0.17 BGN. The amount of 8 229 567.10 BGN was divided into two groups - costs for mono-products (67.73%) and costs for combined products (32.27%). The analysis of the actual therapeutic practice in Bulgaria showed that the most prescribed products for this indication were beta-blockers Nebivolol and Bisoprolol, calcium channel blocker Lercanidipine and centrally acting anti-adrenergic agents Moxonidine and Rilmenidine. Sartans were represent predominantly by Telmisartan. In all cross-sectional analyses, the significant use of Lercanidipine was very prominent. Regarding the fixed-dose combinations, medicinal products, containing AT1-blocker and thiazide diuretic were preferred choice for treatment - the most prescribed combination was Valsartan with Hydrochlorothiazide (15.93% of the reimbursement costs for fixed-dose combinations). Conclusions: Despite of the clear recommendation in the guidelines, monotherapy was still preferred treatment for uncomplicated essential hypertension /I10/ in Bulgaria, during the studied period /2017-2021/. We must persist with the continuous education of the GPs, in order to improve the therapy and control of the arterial hypertension in Bulgaria.
Gruev et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: