Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
There were careless (but not influential) errors in Eqs. ( 3) and ( 7); the term "2 1/2 ρ i sin Θ" should be changed to "-2 1/2 ρ i cos Θ".There was an error above Eq.( 5) in the evaluation of D ⊥ i/i ; the term "Z 3 " should be changed to "Z".There was an inadvertent error of the κ T coefficient in Eq. ( 11); the term "u ⊥ (1There were sequential errors of κ T coefficients for the friction forces: the term "0.80(κ n -κ T )" for ⟨F tp ⟩ Ψ,Φ in Eq. ( 12) should be changed to "(0.80κ n -1.0κ T )", "(1/2κ n -1/4κ T )" for ⟨F * ⟩ Ψ,Φ to "(κ n -κ T )/2", and "(0.30κ n -0.55κ T )" for ⟨F net ⟩ Ψ,Φ to "(0.30κ n -0.50κ T )".There were also sequential errors of κ T coefficients in Eq. ( 13) and following equations: the term "(0.60T i ∂n i /∂x -1.10n i ∂T i /∂x)" in Eq. ( 13) should be changed to "(0.60T i ∂n i /∂x -1.0n i ∂T i /∂x)", "(0.6κ n -1.1κ T )" for V x to "(0.6κ n -κ T )", "(0.8κ n +2.2κ T )" in Eq. ( 14) to "(0.8κ n +2κ T )", and "(κ n +1.8κ T )" for ZeE below Eq. ( 14) should also be changed to "(κ n + 1.7κ T )".
Takizuka et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: