Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Geodesy can provide valuable information on marine current estimation based on the combination of gravity and altimetry. Gravity is standardly used to estimate the geoid undulation, i.e. the height of the geoid over a given reference ellipsoid. As it is well known, the geoid undulation over the oceans is closely related to the Mean Sea Surface (MSS) with discrepancies that can reach 1–2 m at global scale. By satellite altimetry, one can get the MSS and then estimate the Mean Dynamic Topography (MDT) as the difference between the MSS and the geoid undulation. As the MDT is related to the ocean circulation, information on the ocean circulation to be compared with oceanographic estimates can be provided using these geodetic measurements. In this context, the GeoMed2 project aims at estimating a high-accuracy and high-resolution geoid model for the Mediterranean Sea based on land and marine gravity data and on recent Global Geopotential Models. In this paper, the processing methodology based on the well-known remove–compute–restore approach for the determination of the geoid in the Mediterranean area is presented. In a pre-processing step, all available gravity observations for the wider Mediterranean basin have been collected, validated, homogenized, and unified in terms of their horizontal and gravity system. In this way, a reliable gravity database to be used for the determination of the geoid has been prepared. This data set has been used in computing a gravimetric geoid estimate based on which the MDT over the Mediterranean Sea was obtained. The results of this computation were then revised, commented and compared with other existing MDT solutions. By these comparisons, it can be concluded that the geodetic computed MDT is not yet satisfactory since it is too noisy. This is possibly due to some inconsistencies still present in the gravity data used for estimating the geoid undulation and to the adopted MSS which seems to be too smooth over the Mediterranean area.
Barzaghi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.