PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 11, 2024Built Heritage6 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the performance of urban heritage conservation projects – influencing factors, aspects and priority weights

View Full Paper
SHSunena Abdul HuqBPBimal Puthuvayi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Heritage conservation in urban areas involves complex systems often faced with the dilemmas of maintaining the built form’s historical character, improving infrastructure, and managing development through stakeholder cooperation. At present, the performance of any conservation project is solely vested in conserving the built fabric. Evaluation tools for urban heritage conservation projects do not have provisions for measuring the subjective value of stakeholders who are part of the heritage setting. This study tries to identify and prioritise the factors that need to be considered when developing a conservation project performance assessment model for an urban heritage conservation project from the perspective of experts that can be further evaluated from the perspective of stakeholders. As these complex systems can be better viewed in the context of developing countries, the case of India is adopted. From a literature review, factors that contribute to the outcome of an urban heritage conservation project were identified and categorised into six aspects: the physical, social, economic, cultural, political, and continuity aspects. Through an expert survey, the factors that constituted each aspect were filtered using the feature selection method of correlation to avoid factors that may seem related. The factors under each aspect were ranked using a weighted average ranking method to identify the most prioritised factors determining the outcome of an urban heritage conservation project. The priority weights of the aspects were calculated using Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. The results show that the cultural aspect was the most important aspect, followed by the continuity aspect. The social and physical aspects were prioritised similarly, followed by the economic and political aspects. This study is distinctive because it identifies the influential factors that can help develop a conservation project performance assessment model for an urban heritage conservation project.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huq et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e74937b6db6435876c1866https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00116-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Urban Heritage: Putting the Past into the Future2013 · 194 citations
  2. 2Heritage-sustainability: developing a methodology for the sustainable appraisal of the historic environment2004 · 110 citations
  3. 3USING SEQUENTIAL MIXED SOCIAL SCIENCE METHODS TO DEFINE AND MEASURE HERITAGE CONSERVATION PERFORMANCE2011 · 4 citations
  4. 4The Residents' Perspective in Tourism Research2004 · 143 citations
  5. 5Urban conservation and revalorisation of dilapidated historic quarters: The case of Nanluoguxiang in Beijing2010 · 189 citations