PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2024E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

A Thin Line between Education and Certification: A Battle of PhD Supervision in South African Universities

View Full Paper
MNMohammed Xolile NtshangaseUniversity of LimpopoHMHopi MboweniUniversity of Limpopo

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study sought to critically review and demystify the postgraduate research supervision in South African universities. There is unnecessary discrimination among scholars concerning the certification of lecturers in South African universities. Some lecturers are not recognized as academically fit to supervise doctoral students even when there is evidence that they have the capacity to supervise doctoral research. While there is a lack of recognition of some lecturers with regard to doctoral research supervision, others support this lack of recognition with the argument that it is not fair for doctoral research to be supervised by a lecturer who is still a doctoral candidate. However, this paper argued that it is irrational to think that all lecturers with no PhD completely lack knowledge about academic research. This becomes more irrational if the lecturer in question has some published research works and has shown the skill through conference presentations. Against this backdrop using analytic theory, this study sought to challenge the status quo of how doctoral research is perceived in universities. This study utilized a conceptual desktop form of qualitative research and all sources used are adequately acknowledged. At the core of this paper, the researcher sought to appeal for co-supervision as recognition of those lecturers who are still pursuing their PhDs but already show the capacity to contribute to doctoral research supervision. In its entirety, this desktop conceptual research study found that the lack of recognition in South African universities is a neglect of upcoming researchers and it is recommended that lecturers who are upcoming researchers be involved in postgraduate/ doctoral research supervision. This study’s contribution is to motivate collaboration in doctoral supervision and mentorship for lecturers who are upcoming scholars in South African universities. Keywords: Doctoral Research, Lack of Lecturer’s Recognition, Universities Irrationality, Academic Experience

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ntshangase et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e750a8b6db6435876c935fhttps://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2024536
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Supervision of Doctoral Students with Disabilities in South Africa: Issues, Trends and Reflections for Best Practice2024
  2. 2Academic freedom and doctoral research traditions in higher education in post-apartheid South Africa: Why is PhD a philosophical struggle?2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Earning the right to choose: student selection structures among doctoral supervisors in Africa2026
  4. 4Assessing the Impact of Supervision Quality on Graduate Completion Rates in Institutions of Higher Learning in South Africa and Zambia2025
  5. 5An Inquiry into Experiences of Supervisors and Supervisees in Conducting Research Supervision in Higher Education Institutions in Eswatini2024