Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Wind waves play a crucial role in coastal dynamics and can significantly impact coastal sea levels, especially during extreme events. Ocean winds are changing as the Earth is warming, and hence the waves. The Australian Climate Service (https://www.acs.gov.au/), recognised wind waves as a crucial element to support future coastal climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. Wind wave climate future projections are, however, plagued by uncertainties. One of the primary sources of uncertainty originates from the resolution of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) General Circulation Model (GCM) surface wind speed products. We hereby assess different approaches to regional wind wave climate modelling, to understand the impact of the CMIP6 GCM wind speed resolution. We evaluate the Southeast Australia wave climate results from an unstructured grid regional wave model nested in a global wave model. We compare 30 years (1985-2014) of historical wave climate simulations using wind vectors from the CMIP6 Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) CMIP, AMIP, and HighResMIP experiments (nominal resolutions of ~150 km for CMIP and AMIP, and 25 km for HighResMIP). We then compare these results with the wave model forced by the MRI CMIP surface winds dynamically downscaled with the Conformal Cubic Atmospheric Model (CCAM) (~12.5 km resolution). The findings indicate that the wind wave climate models yield divergent results, particularly at the extremes where the most interest lies for future coastal sea level projections. We discuss the reasons for the differences and propose the best way forward for developing regional wind wave climate projections.
Meucci et al. (Fri,) studied this question.