PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2024Accident Analysis & Prevention22 citationsOpen Access

Personalizing automated driving speed to enhance user experience and performance in intermediate-level automated driving

View Full Paper
MDMaxime DelmasVCValérie CampsCLCéline Lemercier

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In the context of high-level driving automation (SAE levels 4-5), several studies have shown that a personalized automated driving style, i.e., mimicking that of the human behind the wheel, can improve his experience. The objective of this simulator study was to examine the potential transfer of these benefits in the context of intermediate-level driving automation (SAE levels 2-3), focusing on driving speed personalization. In the first phase of the study, the driving speed of 52 participants was recorded. In the second phase, the same participants were driven by an automated car on a highway twice, and sometimes had to takeover during the drive because of a stationary vehicle on the lane. On these two drives, the automated car drove either at the same speed as them (personalized) or 20 km/h faster. The results showed that using a personalized speed driving style led to higher comfort, and that this effect was fully mediated by automated driving perceived safety. Although driving speed predicted automated driving perceived safety, this effect was actually moderated by trust in automated cars. Regarding takeover performance, the results showed that the brake use and maximum force were lower with the personalized speed driving style, leading to lower resulting maximum negative longitudinal acceleration and speed variability. Overall, the results of this study suggest that the benefits of automated driving style personalization in terms of speed extend to SAE levels 2-3. In addition to the experience benefits, this personalization approach could also improve traffic flow and safety.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Delmas et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e785c1b6db6435876f89b1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107512
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Driver headway choice: A comparison between driving simulator and real-road driving2014 · 91 citations
  2. 2Handbook of Traffic Psychology2011 · 356 citations
  3. 3Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future2015 · 147 citations
  4. 4Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings.1993 · 766 citations
  5. 5Necessity of Automated Vehicle Control Customization: Experimental Results during Lane Changing2018 · 5 citations