PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 20, 20253 citationsOpen Access

Balanced and Elastic End-to-end Training of Dynamic LLMs

View Full Paper
MWMohamed WahibMSMuhammed Abdullah SoyturkDUDidem Unat

Key Points

  • DynMo enhances the training process of dynamic language models, achieving a significant reduction in workload imbalance.
  • The solution accelerates training for various methods, including up to 4.52x for early exit and 3.18x for parameter pruning.
  • Implementing DynMo facilitates efficient distributed training across single-node and multi-node GPU systems.
  • The dynamic consolidation of computation improves resource utilization without compromising overall training throughput.

Abstract

To reduce the computational and memory overhead of Large Language Models, various approaches have been proposed. These include a) Mixture of Experts (MoEs), where token routing affects compute balance; b) gradual pruning of model parameters; c) dynamically freezing layers; d) dynamic sparse attention mechanisms; e) early exit of tokens as they pass through model layers; and f) Mixture of Depths (MoDs), where tokens bypass certain blocks. While these approaches are effective in reducing overall computation, they often introduce significant workload imbalance across workers. In many cases, this imbalance is severe enough to render the techniques impractical for large-scale distributed training, limiting their applicability to toy models due to poor efficiency. We propose an autonomous dynamic load balancing solution, DynMo, which provably achieves maximum reduction in workload imbalance and adaptively equalizes compute loads across workers in pipeline-parallel training. In addition, DynMo dynamically consolidates computation onto fewer workers without sacrificing training throughput, allowing idle workers to be released back to the job manager. DynMo supports both single-node multi-GPU systems and multi-node GPU clusters, and can be used in practical deployment. Compared to static distributed training solutions such as Megatron-LM and DeepSpeed, DynMo accelerates the end-to-end training of dynamic GPT models by up to 1.23x for MoEs, 3.18x for parameter pruning, 2.23x for layer freezing, 4.02x for sparse attention, 4.52x for early exit, and 1.17x for MoDs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wahib et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f5a78aab63786de5b4609ahttps://doi.org/10.1145/3712285.3759775
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Revisiting MoE and Dense Speed-Accuracy Comparisons for LLM Training2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2MoE-Lens: Towards the Hardware Limit of High-Throughput MoE LLM Serving Under Resource Constraints2026
  3. 3Dynamic Load Balancing for Distributed Large Model Training: A Hybrid Framework of Gray Markov Chain and <scp>MDP</scp>2025
  4. 4DFLOP: A Data-driven Framework for Multimodal LLM Training Pipeline Optimization2026
  5. 5Parm: Efficient Training of Large Sparsely-Activated Models with Dedicated Schedules2024