PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 22, 2025The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

Variable delay affects conversational turn-taking behavior in the presence of background noise

View Full Paper
BMBenjamin MastersEMEwen MacDonald

Key Points

  • Turn-taking behavior changes occur due to variations in perceived timing during conversations with background noise.
  • The timing of floor-transfer offsets influences communication adjustment between speakers when under auditory stress.
  • Observational analysis of dyadic conversations with varying delays explores cues of conversational difficulty.
  • These results highlight the significance of understanding conversational dynamics in noisy environments.

Abstract

Previous studies have observed that the duration and variability of floor-transfer offsets (FTO) increase when communication becomes more difficult, such as in the presence of background noise. Additionally, talkers have been shown to adapt their communication behavior when difficulty is increased only for their conversational partner. This study aims to examine whether changes in the timing of FTOs are utilized as a cue by talkers to determine if their partner(s) are experiencing difficulty in communication. A real-time processing system was implemented to randomly vary the delay in a communication line between two talkers so as to alter the duration and variability of FTOs perceived by both talkers. The findings, based on dyadic conversations taking place in both the presence and absence of background noise, with and without delay, reveal that the manipulation of perceived FTO timing does elicit behavioral changes, but only when background noise is also present. This suggests that, when there is an expectation of difficulty, the timing of FTOs may be used as a cue to infer the difficulty level of a conversational partner.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Masters et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f83307d24b29c969481223https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0039572
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech1971 · 741 citations
  2. 2Investigating conversational dynamics in triads: Effects of noise, hearing impairment, and hearing aids2024 · 11 citations
  3. 3Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue2010 · 253 citations
  4. 4Tolerable Hearing-Aid Delays: IV. Effects on Subjective Disturbance During Speech Production by Hearing-Impaired Subjects2005 · 53 citations
  5. 5ICRA Noises: Artificial Noise Signals with Speech-like Spectral and Temporal Properties for Hearing Instrument Assessment: Ruidos ICRA: Señates de ruido artificial con espectro similar al habla y propiedades temporales para pruebas de instrumentos auditivos2001 · 335 citations