PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 21, 2025Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology0 citations

Fertility and Obstetric Outcomes in Asherman Syndrome: Assessing the Impact of Hyaluronic Acid Post‐Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis

View Full Paper
GAGeorgina ArmstrongJAJason AbbottRDRebecca Deans

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of hyaluronic acid post-hysteroscopic adhesiolysis on menstrual, surgical, fertility, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes.
  • Identified 128 women treated for Asherman's Syndrome over 11 years.
  • Conducted a retrospective review of medical records and structured questionnaires.
  • 43 women participated: 21 received hyaluronic acid post-surgery, and 22 had surgery alone.
  • No difference in repeat surgical interventions for recurrent intrauterine adhesions.
  • 100% of treatment group resumed menstruation after 6 months; 9% of control group had ongoing amenorrhea.
  • No significant difference in pregnancy rates or maternal/neonatal outcomes between groups.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Installation of hyaluronic acid following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis is suggested to reduce intrauterine adhesion (IUA) reformation in women with Asherman's Syndrome (AS). We aimed to assess the impact of hyaluronic acid following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis on menstrual, surgical, fertility, obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Methods We identified 128 women treated hysteroscopically for AS over an 11‐year period and invited them to participate in a questionnaire‐based study. A total of 43 women were included; 21 treated surgically with hyaluronic acid administered immediately following adhesiolysis and 22 having surgery alone. Outcomes were assessed by reviewing medical records retrospectively and using a structured questionnaire at 3 months and 4 years post procedure. Results There were no differences in the rates of repeat adhesiolysis procedures to treat recurrent IUAs between the treatment and control groups (19% vs. 18%, p = 0.94). All women in the treatment group reported resumption of menses 6 months following the procedure, with 9% in the control group reported ongoing amenorrhoea. There was no difference in the overall pregnancy rate (77% vs. 81%, p = 0.76), maternal and neonatal outcomes between the groups. Conclusions Intrauterine application of hyaluronic acid at the time of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for women with AS was not associated with the number of repeat surgical interventions, menstrual patterns, fertility, obstetric, or neonatal outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Armstrong et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6924e3f8c0ce034ddc34f32bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70071
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Gel in Preventing Postoperative Intrauterine Adhesion Formation Following Operative Hysteroscopy2026
  2. 2Hyaluronic acid in the prevention of adhesions after gynecological surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis2024 · 16 citations
  3. 3Pregnancy in Infertile Patient after Intrauterine Adhesiolysis by Multitherapeutic Strategy: A Case Report and Mini-review2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Asherman Syndrome in Mexican Women: Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes at a Tertiary Hospital2026
  5. 5Hyaluronic Acid Barrier Gel for Preventing Adhesions After Hysteroscopic Myomectomy of Large Submucosal Myomas2026