PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 2, 2025European Journal of Pain5 citationsOpen Access

Longitudinal Outcome Evaluations of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment Programs for Patients With Chronic Primary Musculoskeletal Pain: A Living Systematic Review

View Full Paper
IHIvan Huijnen

Key Points

  • Improvements in health-related quality of life and wellbeing were observed in patients with chronic primary pain.
  • Eighty-three percent of cohorts showed significant improvements from pre- to post-treatment at follow-up.
  • This living systematic review updated the existing literature to assess treatment effectiveness and program design.
  • Findings suggest tailored treatment programs under 30 hours may enhance outcomes for musculoskeletal pain.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment (IMPT), grounded in the biopsychosocial model, is strongly recommended for patients with chronic primary pain. A base review found that IMPT participation leads to sustained improvements in wellbeing, but substantial heterogeneity in program dose and content limited conclusions about optimal design. This first update as a living systematic review (LSR) aimed to assess the long‐term effects (≥ 12 months post‐treatment) of IMPT for chronic primary musculoskeletal pain and explore patterns in treatment effectiveness to inform program optimization. Databases and Data Treatment This LSR updated the base review's systematic search (January 2025) in Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Cinahl. Eligible studies included adults with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain who completed IMPT and were followed for at least 12 months. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Standardised mean changes were calculated for nine outcome domains plus health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Exploratory subgroup analyses examined intervention‐specific factors. Results Eighty‐nine articles (110 cohorts) were included. Significant pre‐ to post‐treatment improvements occurred in 83% of cohorts and were generally maintained at follow‐up. HRQoL, newly analysed, improved in 86% of 30 reporting cohorts. Substantial to high heterogeneity ( I 2 > 61.42%) reflected differences in program design. Exploratory findings suggest that individual formats, using high tailoring and limiting treatment to ≤ 30 contact hours may yield the most consistent benefits. Conclusions IMPT programs provide durable improvements in physical, emotional and social functioning, among which HRQoL, though the evidence remains of very low certainty and program variability persists. Significance This LSR reaffirms the effectiveness of IMPT in improving physical and psychological outcomes in individuals with chronic primary pain, and expands the evidence base by incorporating HRQoL as a novel outcome. HRQoL improvement underscores the long‐term effectiveness of IMPT in improving overall well‐being. Highly tailored, individually delivered IMPT programs that integrate recent innovations and are under 30 h in duration appear most effective in reducing pain‐related disability and improving health‐related quality of life.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ivan Huijnen (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692e3d8d6c9b3ab28c187678https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper