Introduction Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with most Chinese patients diagnosed at a locally advanced stage. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used to improve resectability and survival. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) provides short-term recovery benefits compared with open distal gastrectomy (ODG), but its safety and oncologic efficacy following NAC remain uncertain. This trial aims to determine whether LADG is non-inferior to ODG in terms of long-term survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced distal gastric cancer (LAGC) after NAC. Methods and analysis This is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted at high-volume GC centres in China. Eligible patients (aged 18–75 years; cT3–4a, N0/+, M0) with histologically confirmed distal gastric adenocarcinoma who have completed standard NAC will be randomised 1:1 to LADG or ODG with D2 lymphadenectomy. Surgical quality will be standardised through operative manuals, intraoperative video recording and central auditing. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints are 3- and 5-year overall survival. A total of 998 patients (499 per arm) will be enrolled, providing 80% power to test non-inferiority with an absolute 8% margin, accounting for 15% attrition. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle, with Cox models used for survival comparisons and subgroup analyses according to nodal status, tumour size and pathological response. Ethics and dissemination This trial has been reviewed and approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Approval No. 2025 (865), 16 July 2025). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and international conferences, providing high-level evidence to guide the surgical management of LAGC after NAC. Trial registration number Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500109677; registered on 23 September 2025. Protocol V.2.1, dated 29 June 2025.
Yang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: