PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 16, 2025SAGE Open0 citationsOpen Access

A Stylometric Analysis on Authorship of Quelling the Demons’ Revolt

View Full Paper
YYYang YangGLGuannan Lyu

Key Points

  • To analyze and compare the authorship of Quelling the Demons’ Revolt using stylometric methods.
  • Compared 20 chapters of Quelling the Demons’ Revolt to 60 chapters of Romance of Late Tang
  • Used independent samples t-tests on 90 most frequent characters and 16 lexical features
  • Employed principal component analysis to assess stylistic variations
  • 64 out of 90 MFCs showed significantly different usage frequencies
  • Significant differences observed in 9 out of 16 lexical features
  • PCA indicates entirely distinct styles for both novels

Abstract

This paper compares Quelling the Demons’ Revolt ( QDR ) with another novel, Romance of Late Tang and Five Dynasties ( RLTFD ) whose authorship by Luo Guanzhong is established and which shares a similar genre. Independent samples t -tests were conducted to compare the usage frequency of 90 most frequent characters (MFCs) and 16 lexical features between 20 chapters of QDR and 60 of RLTFD . Additionally, the study employed principal component analysis (PCA) to determine whether these two novels exhibited distinct stylistic variations regarding MFC usage and lexical features. The results of independent samples t -tests show that 64 out of 90 MFCs are used with significantly ( p < .05) different normalized frequencies and there are significant differences ( p < .05) in nine out of 16 lexical features between the two novels. The results of PCA also show that QDR and RLTFD present entirely distinct styles in terms of MFC and lexical features. Thus, from the perspective of stylometry, it could be concluded that the author of QDR is likely not Luo Guanzhong. The conclusion is validated by comparing chapters within RLTFD with the same methods. This conclusion not only poses a great challenge to the dominant view but shows that PCA can be treated as an effective way to solve the questions concerning controversial authorship.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6940ac7d3507a57a7f7a357ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251405558
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper