PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 19, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Semi-Automated Offside Technology in Professional Football: A Critical Case Study on the Necessity of Explainable and Deterministic Artificial Intelligence in High-Stakes Decision Systems

View Full Paper
JTJesús Manuel Soledad Terrazas

Key Points

  • This research examines the implications of semi-automated offside technology in professional football, focusing on the need for explainable AI.
  • Employs a mixed-methods approach combining system analysis and quantitative examination of VAR statistics.
  • Analyzes media-documented technical failures in the application of VAR.
  • Evaluates governance frameworks against algorithmic accountability principles.
  • Barcelona gained about 7 points from favorable VAR decisions, while Real Madrid lost 7 points from adverse calls.
  • Identified technical failures include wrong defender selection and a power outage during VAR oversight.
  • Measurement uncertainties indicate a total error of 34 cm, challenging claims of precision.

Abstract

Background: Semi-automated offside technology (SAOT) deployed across European professional football leagues represents a critical case study illustrating the urgent necessity for explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and deterministic algorithmic systems in high-stakes decision-making contexts.Methods: This study employs a mixed-methods approach combining technical system analysis of SAOT specifications, quantitative examination of publicly available VAR decision statistics from La Liga's 2024-25 season, content analysis of media-documented technical failures, and governance framework analysis against established algorithmic accountability principles.Results: Empirical evidence reveals that in La Liga's 2024-25 season, Barcelona gained approximately 7 points from net favorable VAR decisions while Real Madrid lost 7 points from adverse calls—the worst balance in the league. Documented technical failures include wrong defender selection in Celta Vigo matches, a power outage eliminating VAR oversight during a disputed penalty, and system misinterpretation of goalkeeper touches. Mathematical quantification of measurement uncertainties (34 cm total error from temporal, spatial, and calibration sources) reveals that precision claims exceed physical capabilities.Conclusions: The legitimacy crisis stems not from whether systematic bias exists but from the structural impossibility of detection under current opacity. When Spanish authorities leaked full VAR audio recordings, the federation responded not with transparency reforms but by dispatching police to investigate the leak—exemplifying governance structures that prioritize control over accountability. This research proposes mandatory open-source algorithms, real-time audit logs accessible to affected parties, independent calibration verification, and genuine appeal mechanisms with remedial authority.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jesús Manuel Soledad Terrazas (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69449a922f0218eca95085c9https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.1481.v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Whistle meets the algorithm: the impact of AI-integrated VAR on satisfaction, fairness, and trust in soccer officiating2026
  2. 2Towards AI-Powered Video Assistant Referee System (VARS) for Association Football2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3The Interactional Accomplishment of Refereeing Decisions in VAR Protocols2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4YOLOv8 computer vision for automated offside detection in professional football validated through supervised learning2026
  5. 5From Sport Psychology to Action Philosophy: Immanuel Kant and the Case of Video Assistant Referees2024