PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 10, 2026Value in Health Regional Issues0 citations

Feasibility of Home Hemodialysis for Colombia, Cost-Effectiveness Perspective

View Full Paper
CGCamilo A. Gonzalez-GonzalezEZEdna Zambrano-CardonaJSJulian Serrano

Key Result

Home hemodialysis had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 82,674 per QALY gained, exceeding Colombia's cost-effectiveness threshold of USD 6,630 per QALY.

Key Points

  • This research assesses the cost-utility of home hemodialysis compared to in-center hemodialysis in Colombian patients.
  • Constructed a Markov model from healthcare system and societal perspectives.
  • Analyzed data over a 5-year horizon focusing on QALYs and cost-effectiveness ratios.
  • Conducted sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulations in R Studio.
  • Included direct medical costs from microcosting and indirect costs from patient surveys.
  • Home hemodialysis had incremental costs of USD 25,928 and 0.31 additional QALYs compared to in-center dialysis.
  • The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was USD 82,674 per QALY gained, exceeding Colombia's cost-effectiveness threshold.
  • Considering indirect costs improved the cost-effectiveness profile of home hemodialysis, indicating some economic viability from a societal perspective.

Structured PICO

Does home hemodialysis improve cost-effectiveness compared to in-center hemodialysis in Colombian patients with end-stage renal disease?

P
Population
Colombian patients with end-stage renal disease with contraindications or failure of peritoneal dialysis
I
Intervention
Home hemodialysis (HHD)
C
Comparator
In-center hemodialysis (HD)
O
Outcome
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a 5-year horizon

Home hemodialysis is not cost-effective from a third-party payer perspective in Colombia but becomes economically viable when societal indirect costs are included.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incremental cost-utility ratio of home hemodialysis (HHD) compared with in-center hemodialysis (HD) among Colombian patients with end-stage renal disease with contraindications or failure of peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed from the healthcare system and societal perspectives over a 5-year horizon. The primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Costs included direct medical costs from microcosting and indirect costs based on patient surveys. Data were collected in Colombian pesos (COP) and converted to USD (2022 average exchange rate: USD 1 = COP 4255.44). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Monte Carlo simulations in R Studio. RESULTS: From the payer perspective, HHD generated incremental costs of USD 25 928 and 0.31 additional QALYs compared with HD, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of USD 82 674 per QALY gained, exceeding the cost-effectiveness threshold for Colombia (USD 6630 per QALY). From the societal perspective, incorporating indirect costs significantly improved HHD's cost-effectiveness profile, demonstrating potential economic viability. CONCLUSIONS: Although home hemodialysis is not cost-effective from a third-party payer perspective in Colombia, it becomes a viable alternative when considering indirect costs and out-of-pocket expenses. This study highlights the need for health policy decisions in Latin America to be based on comprehensive assessments that go beyond direct medical costs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gonzalez-Gonzalez et al. (2025) studied this question. Home hemodialysis had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 82,674 per QALY gained, exceeding Colombia's cost-effectiveness threshold of USD 6,630 per QALY.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6963223291e05aa366cb8c54https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101561
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper