BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used as end points in clinical trials. However, the magnitude of observed changes in control arms attributable to placebo effects, as compared with other benefits of trial participation, has not been described. This study seeks to estimate the magnitude of the placebo effect by calculating changes in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) scores, which quantify the impact of heart failure on patients’ symptoms, function, and quality of life, after participants were unblinded to treatment. METHODS: REDUCE LAP-HF II (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure II) randomized participants to atrial shunt or sham procedure, with unblinding after 2 years. The KCCQ was collected at baseline, 2, and 3 years after randomization. KCCQ-OS change from baseline to 2 years (placebo effect plus other benefits from trial participation) and the change from 2 to 3 years (placebo effect loss after unblinding) were calculated in sham-treated patients using mean±SD, as were changes from 2 to 3 years in shunt-treated patients (placebo effect benefit). RESULTS: The analytic cohort included 421 participants (median age, 72 years; 65.6% female). Among sham-treated participants (N=182), the mean±SD KCCQ-OS 2-year improvement from baseline was +9.3±22.4 points, with a decrement after unblinding of −1.7±18.2 points from 2 to 3 years. Among shunt-treated patients (N=239), mean±SD KCCQ-OS 2-year improvement was +12.7±22.8 points, with an improvement after unblinding of +1.9±18.2 points. In a hypothetical unblinded trial where placebo effect benefit would be expected in the active intervention arm, and none in the untreated arm, the combined effects would be 3.6 points. CONCLUSIONS: In a sham-controlled device trial that collected patient-reported outcome data during blinded allocation to treatment or sham and after unblinding, the estimated mean placebo effect benefit and loss on the KCCQ-OS were small (≤2 points). Finding a modest placebo effect on patient-reported outcomes may increase confidence in their use as clinical trial outcomes.
Girard et al. (Mon,) studied this question.