Serelaxin significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 37% compared to placebo in patients with acute heart failure.
What are the appropriate decongestion strategies for patients with acute heart failure?
This review outlines an evidence-based approach to decongestion in acute heart failure, emphasizing high-dose IV diuretics and vasodilators as first-line therapy.
Effect estimate: HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.43-0.93)
Congestion is a major reason for hospitalization in acute heart failure ( HF ). Therapeutic strategies to manage congestion include diuretics, vasodilators, ultrafiltration, vasopressin antagonists, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and potentially also novel therapies such as gut sequesterants and serelaxin. Uncertainty exists with respect to the appropriate decongestion strategy for an individual patient. In this review, we summarize the benefit and risk profiles for these decongestion strategies and provide guidance on selecting an appropriate approach for different patients. An evidence‐based initial approach to congestion management involves high‐dose i.v. diuretics with addition of vasodilators for dyspnoea relief if blood pressure allows. To enhance diuresis or overcome diuretic resistance, options include dual nephron blockade with thiazide diuretics or natriuretic doses of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Vasopressin antagonists may improve aquaresis and relieve dyspnoea. If diuretic strategies are unsuccessful, then ultrafiltration may be considered. Ultrafiltration should be used with caution in the setting of worsening renal function. This review is based on discussions among scientists, clinical trialists, and regulatory representatives at the 9th Global Cardio Vascular Clinical Trialists Forum in Paris, France, from 30 November to 1 December 2012.
Mentz et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in acute heart failure. serelaxin vs. placebo was evaluated on dyspnoea improvement and all-cause mortality at 180 days (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.93). Serelaxin significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 37% compared to placebo in patients with acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: