PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 22, 2026Breast Cancer Research and Treatment1 citationsOpen Access

Real-world outcomes of reduced-dose versus standard-dose antibody drug conjugates in metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study

View Full Paper
NSNickolas StabelliniJKJasskiran KaurCOCynthia Owusu

Key Points

  • To assess whether reduced doses of trastuzumab deruxtecan or sacituzumab govitecan yield comparable outcomes to standard doses in metastatic breast cancer.
  • Retrospective cohort study of metastatic breast cancer patients receiving SG or T-DXd.
  • Inclusion of patients treated from April 2021 to December 2024.
  • Primary outcomes analyzed: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
  • Kaplan–Meier curves and Log-Rank tests compared PFS and OS between reduced and standard doses.
  • Subgroup analyses by HER2 and hormone receptor status were performed.
  • Median PFS for sacituzumab govitecan was 3 months for both standard and reduced doses.
  • Median OS for sacituzumab govitecan was 10 months for standard dose and 11 months for reduced dose.
  • Median PFS for trastuzumab deruxtecan was 10.4 months for standard and 11.2 months for reduced doses.
  • Median OS for trastuzumab deruxtecan was 18.3 months for standard and 28.1 months for reduced doses.
  • Overall response rates were similar between reduced and standard doses for both SG and T-DXd.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To evaluate whether reduced doses (RD) of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) or sacituzumab govitecan (SG) provide similar outcomes to the approved standard doses (SD) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods This retrospective cohort included mBC patients receiving at least one cycle of SG (April 2021–May 2024) or T-DXd (February 2020–December 2024). Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier curves and Log-Rank tests estimated and compared PFS and OS from treatment initiation. Subgroup analyses were performed by HER2 and hormone receptor status. Results 48 patients received SG (24 RD vs. 24 SD) and 66 received T-DXd (29 RD vs. 37 SD). Median PFS for SG was 3 months in both SD (95% CI, 2–10) and RD (95% CI, 2–8; p = 0.8). Median OS for SG was 10 months (95% CI, 7–13) for SD and 11 months (95% CI, 5–30; p = 0.4) for RD. For T-DXd, median PFS was 10.4 months for SD (95% CI, 7.0–14.5) and 11.2 months for RD (95% CI, 5.4–31.1; p = 0.8), while median OS was 18.3 months (95% CI, 13.9–NA) for SD and 28.1 months (95% CI, 18.2–NA; p = 0.9) for RD. Overall response rates were similar between patients receiving RD and SD SG or T-DXd. Conclusions This real-world data suggest RD of SG or T-DXd achieve outcomes comparable to SD, supporting prospective evaluation of lower-dose regimens.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stabellini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6971bd6a642b1836717e21d4https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07891-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper