PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Journal of Crohn s and Colitis0 citations

P0987Bowel Wall Thickness and Vascularization Predict Improvement of Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis

View Full Paper
CBC BezzioABArianna Dal BuonoGMGiulia Migliorisi

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how ultrasound findings relate to bowel urgency in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing advanced therapy.
  • Retrospective study of patients with active ulcerative colitis.
  • Assessments included clinical evaluations, intestinal ultrasound (IUS), transperineal ultrasound (TPUS), and ileocolonoscopy at baseline and 24 weeks.
  • Parameters analyzed included bowel wall thickness (BWT), vascularization, and endoscopic activity using the Mayo subscore.
  • 80% of patients reported moderate-to-severe bowel urgency at baseline (median NRS 7).
  • Bowel wall thickness and vascularization showed strong correlations with urgency severity (r = 0.62, r = 0.55).
  • 64% of patients improved urgency after 24 weeks, with a median NRS reduction of -3 points.
  • BWT <3.3 mm predicted clinical improvement in urgency with 79% positive predictive value.

Abstract

Abstract Background Bowel urgency is one of the most burdensome symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), often persisting even when endoscopic inflammation improves. Although intestinal ultrasound (IUS) and transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) are non-invasive tools capable of assessing rectal and colonic inflammation, their relationship with bowel urgency remains unclear.The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between ultrasound findings, endoscopic activity and bowel urgency in patients with moderate-to-severe UC who are initiating advanced therapy. Methods This retrospective study included patients with active UC who underwent clinical assessment, IUS, and TPUS, along with ileocolonoscopy, both at baseline and after 24 ± 4 weeks of advanced therapy. Ultrasound parameters included bowel wall thickness (BWT), layer-specific thickness, wall stratification, vascularization, and Milan Ultrasound Criteria score of rectal walls assessed by transperineal imaging. Correlation between ultrasound findings, bowel urgency (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), and endoscopic Mayo subscore (eMS) was evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r). Results A total of 49 patients were included in this interim analysis. At baseline, 80% of patients reported moderate-to-severe bowel urgency (median NRS 7 IQR 6–8). Both BWT (r = 0.62, p 0.001) and vascularization (r = 0.55, p 0.001) showed strong correlation with urgency severity. Significant correlations were also observed between TPUS parameters and eMS (r = 0.64 for BWT; r = 0.59 for vascularization, p 0.001). After 24 weeks, 64% of patients showed clinical improvement in urgency (median NRS reduction −3 points). Among all ultrasound parameters, vascularization showed the most frequent improvement, occurring in 70% of clinical responders by week 24. A post-treatment BWT 3.3 mm was associated with clinically meaningful improvement in urgency (PPV 79%, NPV 71%). The ROC analysis at 24 weeks identified a BWT cut-off of 3.3 mm for predicting persistent urgency (AUC 0.80). Conclusion Ultrasound parameters, in particular BWT and vascularization, demonstrate strong correlations with bowel urgency and endoscopic activity in UC. Vascularization emerges as the most frequent indicator of sonographic response, whereas achieving a BWT 3.3 mm predicts improvement in urgency. These findings support the role of IUS/TPUS as complementary tools in guiding treatment optimization and escalation in patients with persistent clinically meaningful urgency despite the initiation of advanced therapy. Conflict of interest: Bezzio, Cristina: No conflict of interest Dal Buono, Arianna: No conflict of interest Mrs. Migliorisi, Giulia: No conflict of interest Gabbiadini, Roberto: No conflict of interest Loy, Laura: No conflict of interest Privitera, Giuseppe: No conflict of interest Ferretti, Silvia: No conflict of interest Masoni, Benedetta: No conflict of interest Armuzzi, Alessandro: No conflict of interest

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bezzio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69731005c8125b09b0d1fc65https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf231.1168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper