PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth3 citationsOpen Access

Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring on maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
RSRenuka SuvarnaSSSahana Shetty

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
  • Comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Scopus
  • Comparison between Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose
  • Analysis of outcomes using mean differences and odds ratios
  • Five studies included in the review.
  • Significant reduction in HbA1c by 0.21% with CGM compared to SMBG (p = 0.02)
  • Lower rate of macrosomia in the CGM group (OR: 0.50, p < 0.00001)
  • Reduced birth weight in the CGM group by 151.68 gm (p = 0.0005)
  • No significant differences observed in other secondary outcomes.

Abstract

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) by providing real-time glucose data and glucose trends is a useful tool in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) evaluated the impact of CGM on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with GDM. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Scopus identified RCTs comparing CGM with SMBG in women with GDM. Outcomes were analyzed using mean differences and odds ratios, with meta-analysis performed in RevMan 5.4. Five studies were included in this review. Maternal outcomes showed a significant reduction in HbA1c MD: -0.21% (-0.39, -0.03) p = 0.02 with CGM compared to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG). Neonatal outcomes indicated a lower rate of macrosomia OR: 0.50 (0.40, 0.61) p < 0.00001 and reduced birth weight MD: -151.68 gm (-237.21, -66.14) p = 0.0005 in the CGM group. However, no significant differences were observed in other secondary outcomes. The study demonstrated that the CGM group had a significantly lower HbA1c, with lower rates of macrosomia and reduced birth weights compared to SMBG. While CGM is effective for improving outcomes in GDM, further research is needed to establish pregnancy-specific glucose targets and address cost and accessibility challenges.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suvarna et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69800910aa6434d8c2036dcfhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-08663-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper