Abstract The MKS®-Thronaxis Framework positions Thronaxis Cosmology as its ontological pillar. Yet this positioning is frequently distorted by modern secular categories that impose a false binary: either Thronaxis is reduced to a A rival astrophysical hypothesis competing within heliocentric cosmology, or it is dismissed as symbolic metaphysics lacking empirical warrant. This paper rejects both distortions. Thronaxis Cosmology is a revelatory ontology of centring: it locates the Divine Throne as the ultimate centre of authority, reality, and intelligibility— disclosed in Scripture as situated above the Raqia in the far North (Isaiah 14:13; Psalm 48:2; Psalm 103:19; Job 26:7; Ezekiel 1; Revelation 4:4–5). However, this ontological The claim is not detached from the created order. Under the methodological pillar of Empirical Metadisciplinary Theology (EMT), Thronaxis Cosmology identifies empirical witnesses within creation that testify to this revealed reality. Polaris fixity functions as the primary astronomical anchor—created testimony toward the transcendent centre above the Raqia. Geomagnetic north Convergence operates as a theological GPS—terrestrial correspondence to axial ordering that points toward the Throne’s revealed position. The auroral concentration at the poles, navigational orientation regularities, and calendrical ordering of luminaries around the northern axis provide corroborative witnesses. The North functions as the axis-centre around which the major luminaries (sun and moon)and minor luminaries (stars and wandering stars) are ordered. This paper formalizes the Non-Created-Centre Principle: No entity within the created order can function as the ultimate ontological center, while creation bears ordered witness to transcendence. This clarification strengthens Phase 1 conceptual narrowing without retreat, stabilizes the Thronaxis pillar in relation to EMT and Hierarchical Epistemology, and advances MKS ®-Thronaxis as a post-postmodern reconstruction of scientific meaning beyond heliocentric neutrality claims.
JPierre KIBIISYO MMASAI (Thu,) studied this question.