PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks0 citationsOpen Access

Performance Benchmarking of 5G SA and NSA Networks for Wireless Data Transfer

View Full Paper
MPMiha PipanMŠMarko ŠimićNHNiko Herakovič

Key Points

  • The research aims to compare the performance of 5G standalone and non-standalone networks for data transfer.
  • Conducted standardized tests to measure latency, throughput, jitter, and packet loss.
  • Evaluated various communication protocols including MQTT, CoAP, and OPC UA.
  • Performed experiments in a controlled hardware environment with different data sizes and configurations.
  • Analyzed the impact of 5G architecture on protocol performance and overhead.
  • SA networks showed consistently lower latency and better stability in data transfer rates.
  • Lightweight IoT protocols like MQTT and CoAP operated reliably in both SA and NSA environments.
  • The study identified current limitations of 5G networks in supporting remote sensing and industrial applications.

Abstract

This paper presents test results of the performance comparison of 5G standalone (SA) and non-standalone (NSA) networks in the context of gathering data of remote sensors and machines. The study evaluates key network characteristics such as latency, throughput, jitter and packet loss (for UDP protocol only) using standardized tests to gain insights into the impact of these factors on real-time and data-intensive communication. In addition, a range of communication protocols including OPC UA, Modbus, MQTT, AMQP, CoAP, EtherCAT and gRPC were tested to assess their efficiency, scalability and suitability with different send data sizes. By conducting experiments in a controlled hardware environment, we have analyzed the impact of the 5G architecture on protocol behavior and measured the transmission performance at different data sizes and connection configurations. Particular attention is paid to protocol overhead, data transfer rates and responsiveness, which are crucial for industrial automation and IoT deployments. The results show that SA networks consistently offer lower latency and more stable performance, where robust and low-latency data transfer is essential. In contrast, lightweight IoT protocols such as MQTT and CoAP demonstrate reliable operation in both SA and NSA environments due to their low overhead and adaptability. These insights are equally important for time-critical industrial protocols such as EtherCAT and OPC UA, where stability and responsiveness are crucial for automation and control. The study highlights current limitations of 5G networks in supporting both remote sensing and industrial use cases, while providing guidance for selecting the most suitable communication protocols depending on network infrastructure and application requirements. Moreover, the results indicate directions for configuring and optimizing future 5G networks to better meet the demands of remote sensing systems and Industry 4.0 environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pipan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434b4f1d9ada3c1fb32bchttps://doi.org/10.3390/jsan15010018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental Evaluation and Performance Analysis of 5G NSA Networks2026
  2. 2Measurement of Communication Performance Between 5G Devices in a 5G SA Network2024
  3. 35G and 4G in the Field: Performance Assessment through Trials2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Over-the-Air Performance Evaluation of an Open-Source Private 5G SA Network for B5G Experimentation2026
  5. 5Field Trials for Different 5G NSA Cellular Networks2024 · 5 citations