PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Pathophysiology0 citationsOpen Access

Bioinformatic Analysis of Contrasting Expression Patterns and Molecular Interactions of TIMPs in Breast Cancer: Implications for Tumor Progression and Survival

View Full Paper
LCLorena Cayetano-SalazarUniversidad Autónoma de GuerreroJGJhactcidi Jackeline García-LópezUniversidad Autónoma de GuerreroDNDania A. Nava-TapiaUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare expression patterns of TIMPs in breast cancer and evaluate their molecular roles and clinical significance.
  • Compared expression patterns of TIMPs using TCGA PanCancer, cBioPortal, and GEO datasets.
  • Assessed correlations of TIMP expression with overall survival in the TCGA Breast Invasive Carcinoma cohort.
  • Conducted pathway enrichment analysis using GO, KEGG, and DAVID.
  • Analyzed immune cell and stromal cell relationships with TIMP expression using the EPIC algorithm.
  • Statistical analyses were performed using R.
  • TIMP1 was overexpressed in breast tumors, correlating significantly with various subtypes and stage progression.
  • TIMP2, TIMP3, and TIMP4 were downregulated in tumors; TIMP1 and TIMP4 expression linked to better survival.
  • TIMP1 gene interactions enriched in NF-kappa and PI3K–Akt pathways; TIMP2 associated with Hedgehog and MAPK pathways.
  • TIMP2 showed strong correlations with MMP2 and MMP14, while TIMP4 correlated negatively with MMP1 and MMP9.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Although tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) are key regulators in breast cancer, their differential expression, clinical relevance, and molecular roles remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the expression patterns of the four TIMPs in breast cancer and evaluate their molecular interactions and associated pathways through an integrated bioinformatic analysis. Methods: The expression of TIMPs and their correlations with MMPs were analyzed using the TCGA PanCancer, cBioPortal, and GEO datasets. Associations between TIMP expression and overall survival were assessed in the TCGA Breast Invasive Carcinoma PanCancer cohort. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using GO, KEGG, and DAVID. The relationships between immune cell infiltration, stromal cells, and TIMP expression were assessed using the EPIC algorithm. Statistical analyses were performed using R. Results: TIMP1 was the only inhibitor overexpressed in breast tumors and showed significant associations with the Luminal B, HER2, TNBC, and normal-like subtypes, along with a modest increase across stages. TIMP2, TIMP3, and TIMP4 were downregulated in tumors. High expression of TIMP1 and TIMP4 correlated with better overall survival. TIMP1-associated genes were enriched in NF-kappa and PI3K–Akt signaling and actin cytoskeleton components. TIMP2 was linked to Hedgehog and MAPK pathways and actin-related elements. TIMP3 correlated with Hedgehog and PI3K–Akt signaling, DNA damage response, and membrane components. TIMP4 was associated with VEGF, MAPK, PI3K–Akt, DNA damage pathways, and actin organization. TIMP2 showed strong positive correlations with MMP2 and MMP14, while TIMP4 showed negative correlations with MMP1 and MMP9. Interestingly, we found a strong positive correlation between TIMP2 and TIMP3 with ADAM12, as well as between TIMP2 and TIMP3 with ADAM10, and negative correlations with ADAM15. The differential expression of TIMPs favors greater infiltration of immune cells related to tumor progression and poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Conclusions: TIMPs display contrasting expression profiles and distinct pathway associations in breast cancer. TIMP1 emerges as the only consistently overexpressed inhibitor, while TIMP4 appears as a promising prognostic marker with unique MMP correlations that may influence tumor behaviors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cayetano-Salazar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434c0f1d9ada3c1fb33a5https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology33010013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper