PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Prognostic impact of patterns of in-hospital heart failure on clinical outcomes after myocardial infarction

View Full Paper
SOS OkitaYSY SaitoHYHiroaki Yaginuma

Key Result

In AMI patients, in-hospital HF treated with inotropes had 34.9% mortality vs 5.9% with diuretics only and 2.2% with no HF; post-discharge outcomes were similar for HF groups.

Key Points

  • This study evaluates how different in-hospital treatments for heart failure affect clinical outcomes after myocardial infarction. The focus is on understanding the risks associated with various treatment patterns.
  • Retrospective multicenter analysis of 2426 patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Categorization of patients into three groups: no heart failure, diuretics only, and inotropes
  • Assessment of in-hospital mortality and outcomes post-discharge, including rehospitalization rates.
  • 646 patients (26.6%) experienced in-hospital heart failure during hospitalization for myocardial infarction
  • In-hospital mortality was highest in the inotropes group at 34.9%, compared to 5.9% for diuretics only and 2.2% for no heart failure
  • After median follow-up, 196 patients (9.7%) reached the primary endpoint, with comparable long-term outcomes between the diuretics only and inotropes groups.

Structured PICO

Does the pattern of in-hospital heart failure treatment (intravenous diuretics vs inotropes/vasopressors) impact in-hospital mortality and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI?

P
Population
2,426 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
I
Intervention
In-hospital heart failure treatment categorized as 'diuretics only' (intravenous diuretics without inotropes/vasopressors) or 'inotropes' (inotropes/vasopressors with or without diuretics).
C
Comparator
No heart failure group (patients who received neither intravenous diuretics nor inotropes/vasopressors).
O
Outcome
All-cause death during hospitalization and a composite of all-cause death and heart failure rehospitalization after discharge.composite

In patients with AMI undergoing PCI, developing in-hospital HF requiring inotropes is associated with high in-hospital mortality, but long-term outcomes among survivors are similarly poor regardless of whether HF was treated with diuretics alone or inotropes.

Abstract

Abstract Background Acute heart failure (HF) is a common complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during hospitalization. Although in-hospital HF is associated with poor outcomes, the prognostic impact of patterns of HF management remains unclear. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the relationship of the patterns of in-hospital HF treatments with intravenous diuretics and inotropes/vasopressors to clinical outcomes after AMI. Methods This retrospective multicenter study included 2426 patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In-hospital HF was defined as the administration of intravenous diuretics and/or inotropes and vasopressors during hospitalization for AMI. Patients were categorized into three groups: no HF (patients received neither intravenous diuretics nor inotropes/vasopressors), diuretics only (diuretics without inotropes/vasopressors), and inotropes (inotropes/vasopressors with and without diuretics) groups. The primary endpoints included all-cause death during hospitalization and a composite of all-cause death and HF rehospitalization after discharge (Figure 1). Results Of the 2426 patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, 646 (26.6%) experienced in-hospital HF. Among them, 185 (7.6%) were categorized into the diuretics only group, and 461 (19.0%) into the inotropes group, while the remaining 1780 (73.4%) patients were categorized as the no HF group (Figure 1). During the hospitalization for the current AMI, 212 (8.7%) patients died. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in the inotropes group (34.9%), followed by the diuretics only group (5.9%) and the no HF group (2.2%) (P0.001). A follow-up outcome assessment was done in 2018 patients who survived to discharge. During a median follow-up of 535 349-1308 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 196 (9.7%) patients after discharge. A composite of all-cause death and HF rehospitalization occurred in 105 (6.5%) patients in the no HF group, while those in the diuretics (21.2%) and inotropes (24.3%) groups had a similar risk of the primary endpoint after discharge (Figure 2). Conclusions In patients with AMI, the development of HF during hospitalization was associated with increased in-hospital mortality, particularly in those treated with inotropes and vasopressors. Although patients with in-hospital HF had a higher risk of death and HF rehospitalization after discharge as compared to those with no HF, long-term clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between the diuretics only and inotropes groups.Figure 1 Figure 2

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Okita et al. (2025) studied this question. In AMI patients, in-hospital HF treated with inotropes had 34.9% mortality vs 5.9% with diuretics only and 2.2% with no HF; post-discharge outcomes were similar for HF groups.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827a20fc35cd7a884670fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1931
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper