Only 14% of real-world PAH patients met RCT criteria; trial-like patients had better 5-year survival but trial-like status was not independently linked to prognosis.
Does meeting RCT inclusion criteria ('trial-like') associate with improved 5-year survival compared to 'real-world' PAH patients?
Only 14% of real-world PAH patients meet the inclusion criteria of contemporary RCTs, highlighting a significant gap in the representativeness of clinical trial populations.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Abstract PH is a rare condition associated with high mortality and morbidity. Recent RCT have significantly influenced the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), leading to improved outcomes for PAH patients. However, patients enrolled in RCT can differ from those encountered in regular clinical practice, especially considering the profound demographic changes of PAH patients worldwide. In this study we aimed to explore the representativeness of the characteristics of RCT populations in the real-world scenario and we proposed a comparison between patients adherent to RCT criteria and real-world patients. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 764 patients from the FOCUS PAH Registry. Patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria of the most recent clinical trials (AMBITION, STELLAR, GRIPHON, TRITON) and had main baseline characteristics comparable to those of patients enrolled in these RCT (i.e. included in the weighted average) were defined as "trial-like", whereas the remaining population was defined as "real-world". Proportion of trial-like vs real-world patients was assessed at baseline evaluation in the overall cohort. Reasons for not fulfilling the trial-like definition were investigated. The distribution overtime and across different participating centres was also calculated. Study endpoint was 5-years mortality. A multivariable Cox regression model was fitted to assess the association between the trial-like pattern and the outcome. Results: Of 764 patients analysed, only 107 (14%) were trial-like with no differences overtime and across centers with different patients’ volumes. Main exclusion criteria were age and hemodynamic parameters (PAPm 38 or 63 mmHg, PVR 5.5 or 15.5 WU, PCWP 12 mmHg). Trial like patients were younger, more likely had idiopathic and heritable PAH, had less comorbidities (less systemic hypertension 45% vs 32% p=0.013, less AF at presentation 7% vs 2%, p=0.034). Hemodynamic characteristics and RV impairment were more severe at baseline in trial-like (higher PAPm (49 vs 44 mmHg, p0.0001) and PVR (10 vs 8 WU, p0.0001) and more RV disfunction (55% vs 48%, p=0.059). ESC/ERS baseline "Three-Strata" risk category was worse in trial-like patients. Trial-like patients were more likely treated with upfront double therapy combination (48% vs 32%, p=0.004). 5-year survival was better in trial-like patients (Figure KM) but at multivariable analysis fulfilling the trial like definition was not associated with improved prognosis. Conclusion: In the real-world scenario only 14% of patients were trial-like, even in high-volume centres. The main reasons for not fulfilling the trial-like definition were age and hemodynamic parameters. Trial-like patients were more likely treated with upfront double therapy combination and had a better 5-year survival. Enrichment strategies in future studies design are needed to make RCT more representative of real-world scenarios to better address PAH management.
Bertarelli et al. (Sat,) reported a other. Only 14% of real-world PAH patients met RCT criteria; trial-like patients had better 5-year survival but trial-like status was not independently linked to prognosis.