PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026International Journal of Energy Research3 citationsOpen Access

Hydrogen and Oxygen Crossover in Anion Exchange Membranes

View Full Paper
NNNikola NikolićKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyBEBjörn ErikssonKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyCLCarina LagergrenKTH Royal Institute of Technology

Key Points

  • The aim is to quantitatively assess hydrogen and oxygen crossover in various anion exchange membranes under typical fuel cell conditions.
  • Measured permeability of several Aemion anion exchange membranes using a mass spectrometer.
  • Conducted tests at different relative humidities and temperatures.
  • Compared performance with proton exchange membrane (PEM) Nafion.
  • AEMs demonstrate lower crossover rates than PEM, indicating enhanced suitability for fuel cell applications.
  • First-generation AEMs showed decreasing permeability with increased relative humidity, unlike PEM.
  • Oxygen crossover was found to be two to six times lower than hydrogen crossover, dependent on membrane type and humidity.

Abstract

In recent years, anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) have drawn more attention by showing high performance and potentially allowing catalysts based on more abundant materials. One frequently overlooked parameter in these systems is membranes permeability, often referred to as gas crossover. This undesirable phenomenon creates mixed potentials and also hotspots with temperatures high enough to cause membrane defects and pinholes. Therefore, it is important to investigate it quantitatively at conditions where a fuel cell often operates. In this study, hydrogen and oxygen crossover of several Aemion anion exchange membranes (AEMs) are measured with mass spectrometer (MS) at various relative humidities (RHs) and temperatures. The proton exchange membrane (PEM) Nafion is also investigated for a comparison. AEMs are generally less permeable to oxygen and hydrogen than PEM. The first‐generation AEMs show a decreasing trend in permeability with RH, opposite to PEM. The second‐generationAEMs are much less affected by RH levels. The measured oxygen crossover was two to six times lower compared to hydrogen crossover, depending on the membrane type and RH. The influence of membrane interface on crossover is evaluated to be higher for reinforced membranes, but overall smaller compared to the bulk contribution. Overall, AEMs show lower crossover than PEM, and from that perspective making them more suitable and a safer choice for fuel cell and electrolysis applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nikolić et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979b9f0ec2af6756e788ahttps://doi.org/10.1155/er/4277647
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper