This article examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into public administration and the associated risks, particularly in the context of interactions between public authorities (PAs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). It emphasizes the need to ensure openness, transparency, and the prevention of negative aspects of lobbying. The study analyzes the economic-organizational, institutional, and administrative aspects of AI implementation. It identifies and systematizes risks arising from the interaction between PAs and NGOs, such as data inaccuracies and biases, breaches of confidentiality, non-transparent and biased algorithms, as well as lobbying and a lack of oversight or accountability. The research aims to develop criteria for assessing the transparency of management decisions under the latent influence of lobbying. A set of criteria is proposed, covering information accessibility, the rationale behind decisions, stakeholder involvement, and the presence of control mechanisms. Particular attention is paid to accounting for transformational aspects (economic-organizational, institutional, and administrative) that affect the interaction between PAs and NGOs. These require a comprehensive approach to identifying risks and developing effective solutions for ensuring the responsible use of AI and enhancing public trust in government bodies.
Blizkiy et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: