PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Geometric Dual‑Scale Invariant for the Fine‑Structure Constant

View Full Paper
RHR. D. Howard

Key Points

  • The aim is to present a new geometric approach to approximate the fine-structure constant using dual-scale expressions.
  • Developed a dual-scale geometric framework with Honeycomb Alpha and Λ-Alpha expressions.
  • Analyzed the micro-scale tetrahedral architecture of the Honeycomb Unit (HU).
  • Examined the effect of coarse-graining at cosmological scales with octahedral components.
  • Compared findings with traditional numerological approximations of the fine-structure constant.
  • Both Honeycomb Alpha and Λ-Alpha converge to the same numerical value for the fine-structure constant.
  • Convergence indicates a scale-invariant geometric ratio similar to a renormalization-group fixed point.
  • The expressions contain no adjustable parameters, arising instead from geometric constraints.

Abstract

This preprint introduces a dual‑scale geometric framework that yields two structurally distinct expressions approximating the fine‑structure constant α. The first, Honeycomb Alpha, arises at the micro‑scale from the tetrahedral architecture of the Honeycomb Unit (HU) and is explicitly φ‑dependent. The second, Λ‑Alpha, emerges at cosmological scales after extensive coarse‑graining, where octahedral degrees of freedom dominate and φ becomes implicit. Despite their differing internal components, both expressions converge to the same numerical value, suggesting the presence of a scale‑invariant geometric ratio analogous to a renormalization‑group fixed point. The paper contrasts this structural derivation with common numerological α‑approximations, emphasizing that the Honeycomb expressions contain no adjustable parameters and arise from geometric constraints such as the 4:1 tetrahedron–octahedron volume rule, symmetry preservation, and DOF transitions. The result is a non‑numerological, geometry‑driven pathway toward understanding why α takes the value it does, with potential relevance to scale duality, coarse‑graining behavior, and the geometric foundations of physical constants. v1

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

R. D. Howard (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c46267fb587c655e9fehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18529569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper