PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026New Literary History0 citations

Provincializing Modernism; or, Criticism After the End of Aesthetic History

View Full Paper
EHEric Hayot

Key Points

  • This essay explores how modernist assumptions limit current aesthetic understanding and literary criticism.
  • Analyzes historical critical frameworks and modernist viewpoints.
  • Critiques assumptions held by literary scholars regarding modernism and aesthetics.
  • Proposes a rethinking of epistemological practices in literary studies.
  • Identifies modernism as a dominant, yet limiting influence in literary studies.
  • Highlights the necessity of discarding inherited critical expectations.
  • Suggests a broader reform in understanding the aesthetic beyond modernist frameworks.

Abstract

Abstract: This essay argues that understanding the current situation of the aesthetic, about which Fredric Jameson was as right in 1984 as he would be were he to publish the "postmodernism" essay again today, requires scholars to let go of the forms of historiographical expectation and valuation that they have inherited from previous periods. Among the most persistent of these is a generalized modernism, which, this essay argues, characterizes not only the literary critical thinking of those who work in that specific area, but the entire discipline of literary studies itself. Letting go of this inheritance is therefore an important step in, first, a correct understanding of the current situation of the aesthetic, and, second, a broad reformation of the epistemological practices of the critical disciplines.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eric Hayot (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6dae5be6419ac0d52ba6https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2025.a982259
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper