ABSTRACT Produced water (PW) is the largest and most complex waste stream generated during oil and gas production, posing significant environmental, operational, and regulatory challenges due to its high salinity, dispersed hydrocarbons, toxic organics, heavy metals, and naturally occurring radioactive materials. Although numerous studies have reviewed individual treatment technologies, a critical, systems‐level synthesis linking treatment performance, optimization strategies, and sustainability objectives across the produced water management chain remains lacking. This synthesis should encompass current technologies used in the treatment of produced water. This study presents a critical literature review of produced water treatment and management technologies reported in peer‐reviewed journals and selected industrial case studies over the past decade. The review synthesizes produced‐water treatment technologies across primary, secondary, and tertiary stages. It critically evaluates performance, energy and cost trade‐offs, and key operational constraints. The analysis identifies suitable pathways for reuse, reinjection, and zero‐liquid‐discharge applications. The review shows that no single technology can effectively address the wide variability in produced water composition. Instead, hybrid treatment trains integrating mechanical separation, membrane filtration, and thermal or oxidative polishing consistently outperform standalone systems in terms of robustness and water recovery. Practical optimization is governed primarily by pretreatment design, energy integration, and adaptability to fluctuating feed chemistry, rather than by isolated unit efficiency. Persistent gaps are identified, including limited full‐scale validation of emerging technologies (e.g., FO‐MD hybrids), insufficient life‐cycle and carbon‐footprint assessments, and underutilization of digital optimization and predictive control tools. The review finds that produced water treatment performance is maximized when technologies are designed and evaluated as integrated systems rather than isolated unit operations. Energy demand, fouling and scaling control, and pretreatment requirements emerge as the dominant constraints governing operational reliability and cost‐effectiveness. Hybrid treatment trains consistently outperform standalone processes in enabling reuse, reinjection, and zero‐liquid‐discharge applications. Significant gaps remain in the consistent application of sustainability metrics, life‐cycle assessment, and digital optimization tools across treatment systems.
Adepitan et al. (Sun,) studied this question.