Brazilian women’s migration to Portugal has increased in recent years, driven by hopes of safety, improved living conditions, and professional opportunities. Yet these aspirations frequently collide with structural barriers and experiences of discrimination that generate profound psychological distress. Drawing on intersectional feminist epistemology and social constructionism, this qualitative study examines how social markers of difference—gender, class, race, and nationality—intersect to shape the psychological well-being of Brazilian immigrant women in Portugal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen women who sought psychological support after migration. Reflexive thematic analysis revealed three interrelated themes: the migration journey, exposing the gap between idealised expectations and the realities of bureaucracy, precarity, and exclusion; inhabiting a new territory, marked by social isolation, racism, xenophobia, and professional devaluation; and the mental-health impacts of migration, showing how structural vulnerabilities and institutional racism underpin depression, anxiety, and, in some cases, suicidal ideation. The findings challenge the individualisation of suffering, showing that psychological distress stems not from personal fragility but from systems of exclusion and enduring colonial legacies. This study underscores the need for culturally responsive and rights-based mental health care and public policies that recognise migration as a human experience demanding dignity, ethical commitment, and social justice.
Pinheiro et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: