This paper examines whether reference to “existence-as-totality” can be coherent without presupposing an external standpoint. Standard contrast-based models of reference suggest that terms require differentiation from what they exclude in order to achieve determinacy. Totality-expressions appear to challenge this assumption, since no external contrast class is available. The paper argues that such expressions function not as object terms but as limit-conditional terms whose stability derives from performative inevitability rather than differential exclusion. It formalizes the performative condition underlying totality-reference and distinguishes it from circular argument, empirical thesis, and psychological self-evidence. Attempts to deny the domain within which discourse occurs are shown to generate performative contradiction rather than substantive counterexamples. Finally, the paper analyzes the reflexive status of the meta-logical position from which admissibility constraints are articulated. It argues that such articulation does not require ontological escalation or an external meta-domain, but operates as an internal reflexive clarification within existence-as-totality itself. The result is a minimal structural account of totality-reference that preserves coherence without invoking external contrast or hierarchical inflation.
Wangius (Mon,) studied this question.