In the field of modern power systems, power supply reliability has become a core indicator for measuring distribution network performance. It serves not only as a fundamental criterion for judging the continuous power supply capacity of distribution networks but also as a key benchmark for evaluating their power quality. Considering the current status of reliability assessment for distribution network power supply, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of a series of key indicators, namely outage duration, outage frequency, the number of affected customers, power supply reliability rate, and the proportion of affected customers. Through a detailed deconstruction of these indicators, an evaluation model for distribution network power supply reliability is established. In the process of model construction, this study innovatively combines the hierarchical recursive weighting method with the entropy measurement weight determination method to accurately define the weights of each evaluation dimension. On this basis, a fuzzy membership quantification strategy is introduced to precisely determine the classification level of distribution networks, and Monte Carlo simulation combined with triangular fuzzy number is used to carry out uncertainty modeling on the reliability score, realizing the transformation from deterministic evaluation to probabilistic evaluation. This strategy is developed to transform qualitative issues into quantitative analysis, effectively clarify the fuzzy and complex interrelationships among multiple influencing factors, and thereby realize a comprehensive evaluation of power supply reliability for distribution networks. To verify the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method, a distribution network in a specific region is selected as the research object. The aforementioned model and method are applied to assess its power supply reliability, and the precise classification of distribution network levels in this region is successfully realized. This combined model significantly improves the accuracy of evaluation while ensuring the scientific rigor and fairness of the evaluation process. It provides an innovative and practical method for the field of distribution network power supply reliability assessment, and offers substantive reference and support for relevant decision-making and practical operations.
Dong et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: