PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Cancer Research2 citations

Abstract GS1-05: Prognostic and predictive associations of manual, digital and AI-derived tumor infiltrating lymphocytes-scoring: A retrospective analysis from the Phase III APHINITY trial

View Full Paper
RSR. SalgadoLGL. E. Lara GonzalezFGFabiola Giudici

Key Points

  • To compare manual, digital, and AI-based quantification of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their prognostic performance for HER2-targeted therapy.
  • Retrospective analysis of 4,804 participants from the APHINITY trial.
  • Interobserver reproducibility assessed with 262 slides evaluated by multiple pathologists.
  • Continuous scoring performed using manual, digital, and AI-derived methods comparing their agreement and prognostic value.
  • Multivariable Cox regression used to evaluate predictive benefits of TIL scores in relation to invasive disease-free survival.
  • Manual TIL scoring had excellent reproducibility (ICC 0.87).
  • Concordance across methods was modest to moderate (ICC 0.37-0.62), with AI and digital scoring lower than manual.
  • High TIL status associated with reduced recurrence risk (HRs: manual 0.93, digital 0.92, AI 0.87; all p < 0.001).
  • In high-TIL patients, pertuzumab reduced iDFS events by up to 64% based on manual scoring.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are prognostic and predictive biomarkers for HER2-targeted therapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). Manual sTIL scoring demonstrates high reproducibility but may underrepresent immune infiltration. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) offer automated sTIL quantification and spatial assessment but require validation against clinical endpoints. Aim: To compare manual, digital (non-AI), and AI-based sTIL quantification methods, including AI-derived spatial metrics in the phase III APHINITY trial. Objectives included interobserver reproducibility, method concordance, prognostic performance for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival, enhancement of prognostic models by AI, and identification of patients benefiting from adjuvant pertuzumab. Methods: Of 4,804 APHINITY trial participants, 4,306 (90%) had evaluable archival H all p 0.001). AI spatial immune hotspots outperformed percentage metrics (HR = 0.41; p 0.001) and, when combined with manual scores, provided the greatest additional discrimination (p 0.001). In high-TIL patients, pertuzumab reduced iDFS events by 64% (manual HR = 0.36; p int = 0.003), 52% (digital HR = 0.48; p int = 0.025), and 54% (AI HR = 0.46; p int = 0.01). Manual scoring alone identified 562/2,573 (22%) node-positive patients as high-TIL and likely pertuzumab-responsive, whereas AI-percentage lymphocyte identified 625 (24%) thus contributing to further detect 253 node-positive patients who would benefit from addition of pertuzumab (a 10% larger group). AI spatial metrics were not predictive. Conclusions: Despite modest concordance, manual, digital and AI-derived sTIL assessments independently demonstrated prognostic and predictive value for identifying HER2-positive BC patients benefiting from adjuvant pertuzumab. AI-driven sTIL quantification matches and slightly improves prognostic accuracy, importantly both AI and manual sTIL can identify a larger group of pertuzumab-responsive patients. Integrating AI-derived quantitative and spatial metrics into multiparameter models can further individualize HER2-targeting therapy. Citation Format: R. Salgado, L. E. Lara Gonzalez, F. Giudici, F. Rojo, L. Comerma, S. Wienert, J. Palacios, Z. Kos, S. L. De Haas, A. Rodriguez Lescure, G. Viale, Y. Zheng, D. Gao, A. Kiermaier, F. Andre, S. Loibl, M. J. PIccart, R. Gelber, D. Cameron, I. E. Krop, P. Savas, T. O. Nielsen, C. Denkert, S. Michiels, S. Loi, APHINITY Steering Committee and Investigators, The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group..Prognostic and predictive associations of manual, digital and AI-derived tumor infiltrating lymphocytes-scoring: A retrospective analysis from the Phase III APHINITY trial abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-05.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Salgado et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8e3ecb39a600b3f00cahttps://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-gs1-05
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper