Public history and memory-making have become critical areas of study in post-conflict societies as communities seek to understand and move forward from traumatic events. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining archival analysis with oral histories and qualitative interviews to explore the role of public historians, community leaders, and local narratives in shaping collective memories. A notable theme emerging from our findings is the tension between official historical accounts provided by government institutions and alternative narratives propagated through grassroots activism and cultural performances. The study underscores the importance of inclusive and participatory processes in public history-making for fostering social cohesion and national unity. Policy recommendations include promoting collaborative research initiatives that involve diverse stakeholders to ensure comprehensive and equitable representation in historical documentation.
Mukobola et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: