Abstract Objectives: To synthesise current evidence on Bowel motility and Bladder Disorders (BBD) and menstrual disorders across early childhood through adolescence, highlighting shared pathophysiology, psychosocial determinants, and opportunities for integrated, holistic management. T he review emphasises developmental transitions, family context, and system‑level approaches relevant to paediatric and adolescent care. Design: Narrative review of contemporary literature, integrating biomedical, behavioural, developmental, and psychosocial perspectives. Sources include paediatric gastroenterology, urology, gynaecology, developmental psychology, and primary care research. Eligibility Criteria: Peer‑reviewed studies, guidelines, and consensus statements addressing BBD, functional constipation, urinary incontinence, dysfunctional voiding, early‑onset dysmenorrhoea, heavy menstrual bleeding, and menstrual irregularities in children aged 1‑19 years. Results: BBD and menstrual disorders share overlapping mechanisms including autonomic dysregulation, pelvic floor dysfunction, gut–bladder cross‑sensitisation, and psychosocial stress. Toddlers often present with functional constipation and daytime wetting linked to toilet‑training challenges, behavioural avoidance, and family routines. Teenagers experience a shift toward hormonally mediated disorders, including primary dysmenorrhoea, anovulatory cycles, and pain‑amplification syndromes. Across ages, adverse childhood experiences, neurodevelopmental conditions, and school stressors contribute to symptom persistence. Holistic management ‑ combining behavioural interventions, pelvic floor physiotherapy, nutritional optimisation, menstrual education, and family‑centred coaching ‑ improves outcomes and reduces unnecessary medicalisation. Conclusions: A developmental, biopsychosocial approach is essential for managing BBD and menstrual disorders in toddlers and teenagers. Early identification, coordinated care, and empowerment of families and schools can reduce chronicity and improve quality of life. Future research should prioritise integrated care pathways, trauma‑informed practice, and co‑designed interventions with young people and caregivers.
I et al. (Tue,) studied this question.