To ensure food security, integrated mulching and irrigation practices are widely used in arid maize fields. Mitigating climate change is vital for sustainable agricultural development. Yet, few studies have examined how different mulching and irrigation methods affect farmland carbon fluxes, particularly with maize variety shifts under policy guidance. In this study, we conducted experimental observations over five growing seasons using eddy covariance systems in maize fields (including seed maize fields and grain maize fields), where drip irrigation under plastic mulch (DM) and border irrigation under plastic mulch (BM) were employed in Northwest China. Results revealed that the multi-year mean gross primary productivity (GPP), net ecosystem productivity (NEP), and ecosystem respiration (ER) in maize fields under DM were 16.70%, 15.63% and 17.52% higher than those under BM, respectively. The changes in cumulative GPP, cumulative NEP and cumulative ER caused by the alteration of maize varieties were 7.64, 13.34 and 4.20 times, respectively, compared to the changes caused by the irrigation method. After mechanical harvesting, net biome productivity (NBP) was negative in seed maize fields but positive in grain maize fields. However, after the straws were returned to the fields, the NBP of both types of maize fields became positive. Interestingly, the carbon fluxes of seed maize and grain maize, respectively, exhibit strong dependence on soil temperature and leaf area index. Our study will provide important insights for the green and sustainable development of agriculture and the advancement of ecosystem models.
Wang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.