Petrov v. Russia: when satirical counter-narratives to discrimination (re)victimise vulnerable stigmatisation targets, does the European Court of Human Rights law meet lived experience?

Key Points

• Satirical narratives can unintentionally reinforce discrimination against vulnerable stigmatisation targets, leading to additional harm.
• The European Court of Human Rights addresses issues of free expression, yet struggles with balancing satire and the protection of vulnerable individuals.
• Legal frameworks often fail to fully account for the lived experiences of those impacted by discrimination, resulting in gaps in justice.
• This analysis calls for greater sensitivity in legal interpretations to prevent further victimization of marginalized communities.