In regions lacking sufficient data, remote sensing (RS) offers a reliable alternative for precipitation estimation, enabling more effective drought management. This study comprehensively evaluates four commonly used RS datasets—Climate Hazards Center InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), Tropical Applications of Meteorology using Satellite data (TAMSAT), Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks–Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CDR), and Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) against ground-based data—with respect to their performance in detecting precipitation and drought patterns in the Great Ruaha River Basin (GRRB), Tanzania (1983–2020). Statistical metrics including the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), mean error (ME), root mean square error (RMSE), and bias were employed to assess the performance at daily, monthly, seasonal (wet/dry), and annual timescales. Most of the RS products exhibited lower correlations (r 0.8 at most stations) particularly during the wet season (r = 0.52–0.82) while annual and dry-season performance declined (r < 0.5 and r < 0.3, respectively). Performance under RMSE, bias, and ME declined at higher timescales, particularly during the wet season and annually. CHIRPS, MSWEP, and PERSIANN generally overestimated precipitation while TAMSAT consistently underestimated it. Spatially, CHIRPS and MSWEP reproduced coherent basin-scale patterns of drought persistence, with longer dry-spells concentrated in the northern, central, and western parts of the basin and shorter dry-spells in the eastern and southern regions. Trend analysis further revealed that most products captured consistent large-scale changes in dry-spell characteristics, although localized drought events were more variably detected. CHIRPS and MSWEP showed superior performance especially in capturing monthly precipitation patterns and major drought events in the basin. Most products struggled to detect extreme dry conditions with the exception of CHIRPS and MSWEP at certain stations and periods. Based on these findings, CHIRPS and MSWEP are recommended for drought monitoring and water resource planning in the GRRB. Their appropriate use can help water managers make informed decisions, promote sustainable resource use, and strengthen resilience to extreme weather events.
Ogembo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.