Does electrical injury increase electrocardiographic markers of ventricular repolarization dispersion and atrial conduction heterogeneity compared to healthy controls?
Electrical injury is associated with acute abnormalities in ECG markers of ventricular repolarization and atrial conduction heterogeneity, which may indicate arrhythmic risk independent of troponin elevation.
BACKGROUND Electrical injuries are a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity and life-threatening arrhythmias. This study aimed to evaluate markers of ventricular repolarization dispersion and atrial conduction heterogeneity, specifically, the Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and P-wave dispersion, in patients presenting with electrical injury METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, 50 patients with electrical injury were compared with 59 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Standard 12‑lead electrocardiograms were obtained for all participants. Key parameters, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, Tp-e/QTc ratio, and P-wave dispersion, were manually measured by two blinded cardiologists with excellent interobserver reliability. A subgroup analysis was also performed within the injury cohort based on troponin status RESULTS: The Tp-e interval was significantly prolonged in the electrical injury group compared to controls (median 85.0 ms vs. 80.0 ms, p < 0.001). The Tp-e/QT ratio (0.24 vs. 0.21, p < 0.001), Tp-e/QTc ratio (0.20 vs. 0.19, p = 0.005), and P-wave dispersion (45.0 ms vs. 25.0 ms, p < 0.001) were also elevated in patients with electrical injury. Notably, no significant differences in these electrocardiographic parameters were observed between troponin-positive and troponin-negative subgroups CONCLUSION: Electrical injury is associated with significant acute abnormalities in ventricular repolarization and atrial conduction heterogeneity, independent of troponin elevation. The Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and P-wave dispersion may serve as potential electrocardiographic markers of arrhythmic risk in this population, though their prognostic utility requires validation in prospective studies.
Yanik et al. (Tue,) studied this question.