Under international law, states are granted allowances to dissolve religious organizations, but only for select reasons based on narrow circumstances. However, a trend over the last twenty years has seen state authorities over-exercise their margins of appreciation by forcibly dissolving religious organizations on baseless grounds while claiming the dissolutions were for legitimate reasons that comply with international standards. This article analyzes the prevalence of forced dissolution and its impacts on the freedoms of a range of religious communities, especially members of minority religions and new religious movements. It also considers the legitimacy of the reasons found permissible under international law for states to dissolve religious organizations. A spectrum is introduced to grade the rights violations faced by religious communities following the dissolution of their legal organizations, to better understand the implications for the conditions of freedom of religion or belief. Reviews of three relevant cases lodged against Azerbaijan and Russia are conducted to show how dissolution cases arise and what guidance the Strasbourg Court is dispensing on best practices for states when dissolving religious organizations.
A Thu, study studied this question.