This paper pioneers a novel metaphysics-to-physics unification paradigm that deduces a Theory of Everything (ToE) from pure ontological metalogic, breaking the long-standing separation between metaphysical speculation and physical empiricism, and the path dependence of traditional physics on empirical induction and hypothesis fitting. Taking the asymmetric meta-distinction between Being () and Absolute Non-Being () as the sole and irreducible starting point, we abandon all external presuppositions and scientific paradigm constraints, and complete a rigorous, non-empirical, fully necessary deductive chain from the core attributes of Being to the ultimate form of the universe. We first prove the logical necessity of Being’s totality, eternity and embodiment, then strictly deduce that three-dimensional space is the only dimension for bearing internal mutually exclusive distinctions of Being, and that the three-dimensional closed simply-connected manifold S³ is the unique logical form of Being’s embodiment. Ultimately, we verify that the inverse scale self-duality is an ontological necessity jointly determined by the geometric essence of S³ and the totality constraint of Being, thus constructing a self-referentially closed cosmic ontological system that unifies the metaphysical origin of existence with the physical laws of all things. This paradigm realizes the ultimate unification of "Being’s essence-logical geometry-physical reality", and for the first time provides a complete a priori deductive foundation for the Theory of Everything from the perspective of ontological meta-logic, which not only resolves the century-old puzzles such as quantum gravity contradiction and cosmological constant problem, but also redefines the cognitive path of cosmic ontology: from the totality of Being to the locality of phenomena, from metaphysical necessity to physical determinacy. The conclusions of this paper are not empirical hypotheses or mathematical fittings, but the inherent logical necessity of Being itself, marking the birth of a brand-new a priori deductive paradigm for the study of cosmic ultimate laws.
Xinyu Zheng (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: