PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Health Economics0 citations

Trends in Selection Into Medicare Advantage

View Full Paper
AGAnuj GangopadhyayaLoyola University ChicagoBGBowen Garrett

Key Points

  • This research aims to examine trends in enrollment into Medicare Advantage and the implications for risk selection and spending.
  • Analyzed administrative and survey data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey from 2009 to 2020.
  • Developed a regression model to estimate spending among traditional Medicare enrollees based on various characteristics.
  • Applied the model to predict traditional Medicare spending for Medicare Advantage enrollees.
  • Evaluated changes in predicted spending and enrollment characteristics across the years.
  • Medicare Advantage enrollees exhibited 5-6% higher predicted costs than traditional Medicare enrollees between 2017 and 2020.
  • The increase in costs was primarily driven by a larger share of dual eligible individuals in Medicare Advantage.
  • No substantial evidence was found indicating differential selection within specific enrollee groups over the study period.
  • Characteristics of traditional Medicare enrollees showed a trend toward lower predicted spending over time.

Abstract

Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment more than doubled from 2013 to 2023, raising concerns about risk selection, spending, and the continued use of traditional Medicare (TM) spending as a benchmark for MA payment. This study examines trends in selection into MA from 2009 to 2020 using administrative and survey data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. For each survey year, we estimate a regression model of Part A and B spending among TM enrollees based on demographic characteristics, self-reported health status, limitations in activities of daily living, and enrollee group type (e.g., dual eligible, institutionalized, disabled). We apply this model to MA enrollees to estimate their predicted TM spending. We find that since 2017, MA enrollees have had higher predicted costs than TM enrollees-5-6% higher from 2017 to 2020-driven largely by the growing share of dual eligibles in MA. Within enrollee group type, however, we observe little evidence of differential selection. We further use the model results from just our baseline year, 2009, to predict both MA and TM spending in each subsequent year. We find that although MA enrollee characteristics did not trend observably healthier or sicker over this period, TM enrollees' characteristics appear to have shifted in ways associated with lower predicted spending over time. These findings suggest that the nature of selection into MA has qualitatively shifted over recent years and raises further questions about how well the current risk adjustment system reflects appropriate differences in risk as the enrollee characteristics in these groups continue to diverge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gangopadhyaya et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25afb96eeacc4fcec944ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70091
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Advancing the Measurement of Favorable Selection in Medicare Advantage: Evidence From Encounter Data2026
  2. 2How Medicare Advantage Enrollment Affects Spending in Traditional Medicare: Spillovers and Implications for MA Benchmarks2026
  3. 3Growing Divergence Between Medicare Advantage Plan Bids and Payments to Plans2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Total Medicare Program Spending2026
  5. 5Inside The Meteoric Rise Of Medicare Advantage2025 · 5 citations