This work quantifies how spray atomization and vaporization govern ammonia–diesel RCCI combustion by comparing RANS (RNG k –ε), DES (SST k –ω), and LES (dynamic Smagorinsky). Beyond validation against in-cylinder pressure, HRR, CA50, and ITE, and pollutant emissions, we analyze DV10/DV50/DV90, SMD, parcel count, and penetration to expose turbulence–spray–chemistry couplings. LES Captures fine-scale dynamics, including rapid DV50 reduction (≈28 to ≈11.5 µm), enhanced secondary breakup, and core instabilities, generating >160,000 parcels and accelerating vaporization. These resolved phenomena translate into superior combustion fidelity, closely matching experiment peak pressure (84.2 vs 85 bar), CA50 (10.24° CA), ITE (37.218%), IMEP (≈9.1 bar), while accurately predicting emission (UHC: 0.48 g/kWh vs 0.46 g/kWh, NO: 2.15 g/kWh vs 2.20 g/kWh). DES offers intermediate fidelity, whereas RANS retains oversized droplets, slow vaporization, and underprediction of combustion intensity and The total computational expenditure amounted to approximately 410 CPU-h for RANS, 1240 CPU-h for DES, and 3240 CPU-h for LES, using meshes ranging from 200,000 to 8,000,000 cells.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Molima et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69b606ea83145bc643d1d74b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874261418173
Samuel Molima
Institut Supérieur de Technique Médicale
Fathi Hamdi
University of Gabès
Takwa Hamdi
University of Gabès
International Journal of Engine Research
University of Gabès
Institut Supérieur de Technique Médicale
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...